Welcome to BabyandBump's Your Health & Wellbeing Forum - The health of you and your family is very important. Discuss heath issues in this forum - weight, smoking, natural remedies, fitness & general well-being. This thread is called 'Lurpak' and is in our You And Your Family section. |
Jan 8th, 2007, 12:59 PM
|
#1 | | ♥ Caitlins Mummy + Bump BabyandBump Admin
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: North Wales
Posts: 31,766
Thanked others: 2,751
Thanked 2,809 times in 2,104 posts
I'm Currently Feeling: | Lurpak I hate flora so I decided to go with lurpak!
Is this a good option?  |
__________________ | | Status: Offline
| |
Jan 8th, 2007, 13:30 PM
|
#2 |
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,139
Thanked others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| Im not too familer with lurpak, whats the difference between this and normal butter? Have you ought a light version?
The best way to check is to see what the fat content is compared to your normal butter. | | | | Status: Offline
| |
Jan 8th, 2007, 13:41 PM
|
#3 | | ♥ Caitlins Mummy + Bump BabyandBump Admin
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: North Wales
Posts: 31,766
Thanked others: 2,751
Thanked 2,809 times in 2,104 posts
I'm Currently Feeling: | Looked good
Will compare after my bath  |
__________________ | | Status: Offline
| |
Jan 8th, 2007, 14:59 PM
|
#4 | | ♥ Caitlins Mummy + Bump BabyandBump Admin
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: North Wales
Posts: 31,766
Thanked others: 2,751
Thanked 2,809 times in 2,104 posts
I'm Currently Feeling: | Ok fat details
Lurpak:
per 100g: 80g of which saturates 37g which sugars 1.0g
Uterrly butterly
per 100g: 59.0g of which saturates 19.5g which sugars 0.5g
although this says per serving (7g) 37 calories 4.1g fat
Bad choice wasn't it? Says on lurpak
natural veg oil
contains no additives artifical colouring or preservative
contains no hydrogenated fats or oils
Oh damn!!!  |
__________________ | | Status: Offline
| |
Jan 8th, 2007, 15:25 PM
|
#5 |
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,139
Thanked others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| I was about to say holy crap that aint good.
Dont be fooled that marg is any lower in fat than butter, it just uses negatable oil instead of animal fats. So its better for you as it has a lower percentage of saturated fats, but not any help in slimming.
You need to look for light and low options, whether butter or marg. | | | | Status: Offline
| |
Jan 8th, 2007, 15:30 PM
|
#6 | | ♥ Caitlins Mummy + Bump BabyandBump Admin
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: North Wales
Posts: 31,766
Thanked others: 2,751
Thanked 2,809 times in 2,104 posts
I'm Currently Feeling: | Think my whole plan over all is to cut it out as much as I can rather than go for lower fat butter! I'll stick with utterly I think  Unless I find something better in tesco later! |
__________________ | | Status: Offline
| |
Jan 8th, 2007, 15:55 PM
|
#7 |
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 478
Thanked others: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
| TOP TIP: Always butter your toast cool. It doesn't melt in so much then and you'll use less :wink: |
__________________ | | Status: Offline
| |
Jan 8th, 2007, 16:16 PM
|
#8 | | Married, but not ttc Active BnB Member
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Essex (noo!)
Posts: 725
Thanked others: 21
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I'm Currently Feeling: | i love lurpak too much to give it up  Its so yummy! But i'd have to buy my own butter if i wanted to change anyway. DH and FIL would still use lurpak. Added expence we dont need right now
wobbs, i say stick with what u like just use less  |
__________________ | | Status: Offline
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | | |