Home
Momtastic
Site Map
Help
Register
Log In
 

Go Back   BabyandBump > Trying To Conceive Forums > Waiting To Try

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old Feb 27th, 2010, 06:12 AM   #31
lozzy21
Mum (Mom)
BnB Elite
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Teesside,
Posts: 19,440
Quote:
Originally Posted by poppy View Post
Also, in response to those who have posted that IVF shouldn't be funded by the NHS for those older mothers who have wanted a career first...how on earth would that be implemented and work out in reality? The premise of the NHS is to give universal health care to those in the UK. You cannot judge someone for their personal circumstances. Also, what would the NHS do, put out a questionnaire to an IVF applicant in their 40s: 'Tick a) if you have put your career first or b) if you have had complications in fertility or c)if you have not found the right partner before now). I think most people would quickly wisen up to telling the NHS what they wanted to hear if it was going to prejudice their case. So not refusing to fund older mothers because of lifestyle choices would never work in reality.
Im not saying that they should not be funded by the nhs, well i am but thats my opinion but i am not saying it should be implimented. If a women had made an informed choice no to TTC her first child untill she is 45 what do we put the upper age limit as? We then get women having her first child in her 50's/60's? paid by the nhs.


 
Status: Offline
 
Old Feb 27th, 2010, 06:29 AM   #32
Blah11
Mum (Mom)
BnB Spammer Elite
 
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 32,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daisy Delayne View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blah11 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daisy Delayne View Post
It is annoying, the stigma attached to women in their thirties and older having babies. I just think women are smarter these days, and are waiting until their situation is ideal, instead of just popping out babies because that's what women do. So really, there will be a lot less crappy mothers in the future. I for one had no idea who I was or who I wanted to be when I was in my early twenties. I would have been a terrible mother. I'll be going on thirty when we TTC our first, and now that I've got myself together I know we did the right thing in waiting, even though I had ALWAYS planned to have all my babies before thirty. I think the worst thing to do is stick to a set plan, even if your situation isn't the greatest for it.
Age and planning a baby or having one unplanned has nothing to do with how 'crappy' a mother you are.
That's weirdly defensive. I'm not trying to say that all mothers who have unplanned babies are crappy mothers, and if you read what I said I didn't really imply that at all. I'm just saying less women these days are having babies just because they feel obligated to.
Well, I disagree.


 
Status: Offline
 
Old Feb 27th, 2010, 10:58 AM   #33
poppy
Mum (Mom)
BnB Addict
 
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by lozzy21 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by poppy View Post
Also, in response to those who have posted that IVF shouldn't be funded by the NHS for those older mothers who have wanted a career first...how on earth would that be implemented and work out in reality? The premise of the NHS is to give universal health care to those in the UK. You cannot judge someone for their personal circumstances. Also, what would the NHS do, put out a questionnaire to an IVF applicant in their 40s: 'Tick a) if you have put your career first or b) if you have had complications in fertility or c)if you have not found the right partner before now). I think most people would quickly wisen up to telling the NHS what they wanted to hear if it was going to prejudice their case. So not refusing to fund older mothers because of lifestyle choices would never work in reality.
Im not saying that they should not be funded by the nhs, well i am but thats my opinion but i am not saying it should be implimented. If a women had made an informed choice no to TTC her first child untill she is 45 what do we put the upper age limit as? We then get women having her first child in her 50's/60's? paid by the nhs.

I agree with you that there has to be some kind of limit - for the health of mother and child and weighing up the cost of the treatment with the likelihood of it working I suppose. What that age limit is, I have no idea.
I do think being in your late 40s/early 50s would be difficult as your body would be more vulnerable and you would be in your 70s when the baby reaches their 20s. I think most people would agree that late 40s/early 50s would probably not get funded on the NHS unless under extremely special circumstances. However, I recon that most people who go for IVF in their late 40s probably have funded it themselves and gone private and are therefore not a burden on the NHS.

I do think though late 30s/early-mid 40s candidates, should get a chance on the NHS if they struggle concieving naturally. I don't think millions of women would be doing it, so I don't think it would necessarily put a massive burden on the NHS. Like someone else posted, these women who have worked into their mid/late 30s have made a hell of a lot of tax contributions to this country and that is what helps to fund the NHS. What about the financial burden of people who are unemployed and have no intention of getting a job (I am not talking of those who are on the dole who actually are trying to get a job, that is different) and who have loads of children and claim off the state - that is more of a financial burden on the UK, in my opinion. I am a teacher and I have heard some pupils say that they have no intention of getting jobs, but are just going to go and claim the dole and have some kids to get a council flat (maybe an extreme situation in the country in general, but in the area I teach, it is sadly not uncommon).

I think my problem with some of the comments, have been people making judgements on older women (i.e 35 plus) women who are TTC as being people who have 'left it too late' because of wanting to have a big career or who have wanted to party. My point is, how do we know that that is their reason?


 
Status: Offline
 
Old Feb 27th, 2010, 13:02 PM   #34
Blah11
Mum (Mom)
BnB Spammer Elite
 
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 32,886
Lets not turn this into a benefits debate again >.< And anyway, I work and pay taxes and I had my child before my body said no to children.


 
Status: Offline
 
Old Feb 27th, 2010, 13:02 PM   #35
pumpkim
Mum (Mom)
Active BnB Member
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Yorkshire UK
Posts: 601
I agree with those that have said older women should still have the chance of fertility treatment on the NHS regardless of their reason for waiting. I'm already into my 30s and hopefully won't need any help but I'd hate to think I could be penalised because I chose not to have children until I was ready!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by poppy View Post
I agree with you that there has to be some kind of limit - for the health of mother and child and weighing up the cost of the treatment with the likelihood of it working I suppose. What that age limit is, I have no idea.
Out of interest the NHS eligibility for IVF is women aged between 25 - 39 but individual authorities can make their own decisions, it's not recommended over age 42 due to low chances of success.


 
Status: Offline
 
Old Feb 27th, 2010, 13:34 PM   #36
poppy
Mum (Mom)
BnB Addict
 
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,947
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blah11 View Post
Lets not turn this into a benefits debate again >.< And anyway, I work and pay taxes and I had my child before my body said no to children.
I was actually making a general point about people's criticism of older mums getting IVF, I was not referring to any individual member's situation young or old. I don't know anybody's financial/educational/life circumstances on Baby and Bump - who pays taxes and who doesn't - and even if I did, I would never ever criticise a member.

I was also not wishing to get into a benefit debate Blah, I was actually responding to other members' comments about people's taxes funding older mums trying to get funding on the NHS (hmm, benefits debate of sort) and how the money would be better served helping young mothers who needed IVF (I didn't realise it was an either or situation with IVF and the NHS) and coming out in support of another poster's comments about people paying tax and being entitled to support. Obviously, as I have posted above, I realise it is within reason when it comes to fertility help.

My comment about people not paying taxes was actually put in as a point of comparison - as members of the UK, we are all entitled to help when we need it from the NHS. However, if people didn't want a benefit debate, comments about whether or not people should be entitled to help should not have been made...who are we to decide who is worthy and who is not, we don't know anyone's personal circumstances. Just my own personal opinion, I am not trying to sway anyone's view. Just found this debate quite interesting.


 
Status: Offline
 
Old Feb 28th, 2010, 10:46 AM   #37
DJ987
Pregnant (Expecting)
BnB Addict
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Derby
Posts: 7,798
I think the system works well in the NHS, I work in Women and childrens health and believe that the age limits in place are both fair and work well.

I have quite the opposite effect from my family when I talk about TTC they all think it's 'good' and maybe even the trend to wait until I'm in my thirties as 'that's what everyone is doing these days' I completely disagree and think that should I choose to have my children now (I will be almost 24 when we TTC) then that's my choice. Everyone says to me don't you want to get well established in your career first and wait until your thirties, but I think it'll be harder for me to take a career break later on when I have my children! It really annoys me when people criticise us women for either having children early or waiting a bit as I think it's a personal decision and people will do it when they feel it's right or when circumstances permit


 
Status: Online
 
Old Feb 28th, 2010, 11:09 AM   #38
plutosblue
Mum (Mom)
BnB Addict
 
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Cambrigeshire.
Posts: 5,862
I do find it a little harsh that the papers are always going on about how women are leaving it 'too late'. Either by choice or not by choice.
I will be trying for my first this year and I will be 22, but I have waited until I have everything I need (a house, a job, a long term relationship) however if it wasn't for my mother I probably wouldn't be able to afford this house with my partner and if I hadn't met him at the time I did I probably wouldn't be in this position and would have been waiting for years to get onto the property ladder. Maybe if the govenment made things a little bit more affordable and the cost of living wasn't so high then maybe some wouldn't have to wait so damn long.
For those that choose to wait by choice, we are all different, for me I feel ready at 22 but for others then may want to travel, get a career, enjoy life, or may not just 'feel' ready until their later years, thats entirely up to them. This world is too prejudice in general and it makes me sad as regardless we are all equals.

I personally wish good luck to all future mothers who wish to try, be it in their 20's or 50's.


 
Status: Offline
 
Old Feb 28th, 2010, 11:37 AM   #39
DJ987
Pregnant (Expecting)
BnB Addict
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Derby
Posts: 7,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by plutosblue View Post
I do find it a little harsh that the papers are always going on about how women are leaving it 'too late'. Either by choice or not by choice.
I will be trying for my first this year and I will be 22, but I have waited until I have everything I need (a house, a job, a long term relationship) however if it wasn't for my mother I probably wouldn't be able to afford this house with my partner and if I hadn't met him at the time I did I probably wouldn't be in this position and would have been waiting for years to get onto the property ladder. Maybe if the govenment made things a little bit more affordable and the cost of living wasn't so high then maybe some wouldn't have to wait so damn long.
For those that choose to wait by choice, we are all different, for me I feel ready at 22 but for others then may want to travel, get a career, enjoy life, or may not just 'feel' ready until their later years, thats entirely up to them. This world is too prejudice in general and it makes me sad as regardless we are all equals.

I personally wish good luck to all future mothers who wish to try, be it in their 20's or 50's.
Here here!!

I am also 22 and have got my job, my long term relationship with my amazing other half and we have just bought our first house together. I totally agree with what you say about the government not making it particularly easy for people. We are going to TTC July 2011 and people are saying we are mad but at the end of the day we want to and are in a position where we can so why shouldn't we?


 
Status: Online
 
Old Feb 28th, 2010, 11:39 AM   #40
Tasha
Other
BnB Elite
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 13,789
I think too much pressure is placed on women in general, we all make individual life choices and we always are trying to do it for the best (both for us, our partners and children/future children).


 
Status: Offline
 
Reply

  BabyandBump > Trying To Conceive Forums > Waiting To Try


Bookmarks

Tags
hearing, late, leaving, sick, women

Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Is anyone else sick of being treated like something evil? Teen Pregnancy
Is anyone else sick of hearing it? Pregnancy - Third Trimester
Anyone else sick of the words Weaning & Nutrition
Is anyone else sick of cleaning & picking up after OH? General Chatter
Anyone elses sickness dissaperared? Pregnancy - First Trimester