Welcome to BabyandBump's Pregnancy - Second Trimester Forum - 14 > 26 weeks – The morning sickness has gone & the bump is growing. Talk to others and seek advice from maternity wear to what to expect over the coming weeks. This thread is called 'i have a question regarding ultrasounds, please read' and is in our Pregnancy Forums section. |
Apr 21st, 2007, 19:23 PM
|
#1 | | Proud mum to baby Nick Chat happy BnB member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: On Cloud 9
Posts: 852
Thanked others: 0
Thanked 6 times in 4 posts
| i have a question regarding ultrasounds, please read As you know, I had a 4D scan today- seeing as it was private and was classed as entertainment purposes, even if there was the slightest problem, I wouldnt have been informed because apparently they're not allowed to tell ya, which I find absolutely stupid.
Anyway, the tech checked baby's blood flow and all these weird blue and red lines kept coming up in places, I then noticed a blue line which appeared to be in my uterus (I wish I could post a picture) It wasnt a continuous line which ran from baby and below, it just seemed to be stuck in my womb, below baby (but not directly below), This is going to sound do utterly ridiculous, but are you supose to have blood flow round about there? Im worried that I've got some sort of weird bleed, I mean SURELY this dr would have told me to visit my own GP if I had any indication that I was bleeding at all.
They do blood flow checks at the detailed scan, so I'd really appreciate it if someone who has had a detailed scan, could clue me in on this as Im kinda concerned because I dont know what all these weird colours are.
Cheers girls x | | | | Status: Offline
| |
Apr 21st, 2007, 19:27 PM
|
#2 | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Lesmahagow *the Gow* hehe
Posts: 3,261
Thanked others: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
| are you sure that wasnt the placenta? when i went for my growth scan i seen the exact same and i just assumed it was the placenta, although i didnt have a 4d scan it was just a normal scan only i could see the red and blue lines  im sure everything is fine hun
xxxxxx | | | | Status: Offline
| |
Apr 21st, 2007, 19:27 PM
|
#3 | | Chat happy BnB member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Cornwall
Posts: 2,265
Thanked others: 25
Thanked 24 times in 24 posts
I'm Currently Feeling: | hun try not to worry, im sure if there was anything wrong they would tell you, and if they saw a bleed etc they would def tell you about it.
Not sure about the blood flow you mentioned but maybe its the placenta? | |
Last edited by stephlw25; Apr 21st, 2007 at 19:32 PM.
| | Status: Offline
| |
Apr 21st, 2007, 19:32 PM
|
#4 | | Proud mum to baby Nick Chat happy BnB member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: On Cloud 9
Posts: 852
Thanked others: 0
Thanked 6 times in 4 posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by weestar21 are you sure that wasnt the placenta? when i went for my growth scan i seen the exact same and i just assumed it was the placenta, although i didnt have a 4d scan it was just a normal scan only i could see the red and blue lines  im sure everything is fine hun
xxxxxx | The placenta is above the baby isn't it? and not below?
Was the lines you saw blue too? It kinda scared me a little actually because I kept convincing myself it was some sort of weird bleed, but in saying that, would it actually pick up a bleed? doesnt it only eliminate the arteries etc 
PS: It was on the 2d scan that I saw these blue lines below baby- I had both 4D and a normal one. | |
Last edited by Louise; Apr 21st, 2007 at 19:34 PM.
Reason: add text
| | Status: Offline
| |
Apr 21st, 2007, 20:13 PM
|
#5 | Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Lesmahagow *the Gow* hehe
Posts: 3,261
Thanked others: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
| they were blue and red but it was like flashing cos of the baby was moving around so much it wasnt just a constant thing if that makes sence  as steph said im sure if their was a problem they would have told you or they would have asked you to make an appointment with your gp or something dont worry hun im sure its fine
xxxxxx | | | | Status: Offline
| |
Apr 21st, 2007, 21:27 PM
|
#6 | | lucky mum of one of each! BabyandBump Team Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: dundee
Posts: 12,938
Thanked others: 259
Thanked 213 times in 208 posts
I'm Currently Feeling: | teh placenta is all round the baby hun, its wot the baby lives in in ur tum  , never had a 4d scan myself but im guessing if there was a prob they wud of sed  | | | | Status: Offline
| |
Apr 21st, 2007, 21:56 PM
|
#7 | | Chat happy BnB member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: In the land of make believe
Posts: 1,694
Thanked others: 6
Thanked 60 times in 59 posts
I'm Currently Feeling: | Even though they are for entertainment reasons only I am sure that if there were any concerns whatsoever then they would have advised you to see your GP. Surely it would be unethical, not to mention negligent for them not to do so. | | | | Status: Offline
| |
Apr 22nd, 2007, 12:46 PM
|
#8 | | BnB Addict Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,928
Thanked others: 43
Thanked 114 times in 106 posts
I'm Currently Feeling: | When I went for my 4d scan I signed something at the start that among other things said that if there were any problems they would recommend that you see your consultant. These people are fully trained and qualified sonographers, in fact the last one who scanned me at hospital also does part-time at a 4d place. They know what they are looking at and for and if there was anything wrong they'd recommend that you saw someone straight away. It would be highly unethical if they didn't.
I think you're worrying unnecessarily as there is all sorts of weird stuff swimming about in there that you can see on scans. Could be the chord or the membrane or anything.
What a shame you weren't able to enjoy such a special event.  | | | | Status: Online
| |
Apr 24th, 2007, 11:57 AM
|
#9 | | Chat happy BnB member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Paderborn, Germany
Posts: 1,255
Thanked others: 51
Thanked 184 times in 182 posts
| Louise Please don't worry!
The reason a colour flow imaging is used is to get an overall view of blood flow in any targeted region - So blood would have been seen flowing wherever the Sonographer was directing the doppler. The colour of the lines is based on direction (for example, red for Doppler shifts towards the ultrasound beam and blue for shifts away from it) and magnitude (different color hues or lighter saturation for higher frequency shifts) so the fact that you saw a blue line is not representative of a problem.
Hope this helps a little | | | | Status: Offline
| |
Apr 24th, 2007, 12:13 PM
|
#10 | | Mother of 1 boy Chat happy BnB member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Stroud, Gloucester
Posts: 1,475
Thanked others: 58
Thanked 65 times in 65 posts
I'm Currently Feeling: | Quote:
Originally Posted by RachieH Louise Please don't worry!
The reason a colour flow imaging is used is to get an overall view of blood flow in any targeted region - So blood would have been seen flowing wherever the Sonographer was directing the doppler. The colour of the lines is based on direction (for example, red for Doppler shifts towards the ultrasound beam and blue for shifts away from it) and magnitude (different color hues or lighter saturation for higher frequency shifts) so the fact that you saw a blue line is not representative of a problem.
Hope this helps a little | Beat me to it, but rachie is right it is just a doppler view of your blood flow - the different colours indicates oxygenated and non oxygenated blood and flow, so what you probably saw was a vein/artery - i really wouldnt worry.
I must admit i don't like these scans very much, they are very expensive for what they are, and they seem to make people worry more by what they see or 'think' they see. | | | | Status: Offline
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT. The time now is 13:48 PM. | |