This is such a major topic and everyone has a different opinion. All kinds of statistics get dragged about to support one argument or the other. Ultimately, in my opinion, I think it's barbaric and I'd never suggest that anyone does it. It's making a major decision for your child without his input. It's a horrific act especially if it's done for reasons such as religion or, even worse, 'because daddy looks like that' or 'but everyone else I know has had it done'. That's not a very good justification at all.
I would say that it's up to you, as the parent, in most cases, anything to do with your child is, but should such a decision really be up to you? Altering the genitalia of someone should really only be done with consent, shouldn't it?
But as I say, everyone has very strong opinions on this and in the end, everyone thinks they are right.
One thing, as a woman, I think you and others should consider. Let's say you were born in another part of the world where Female circumcision or other genitalia altering practices were common place. Would you have wanted your parents to have influence over the working of your sexual organs because society, peer pressure, their need for you to conform or family history dictated they should?
If there is a sound medical argument, (and sometimes there is in a small number of cases) then that's a medical decision (not cultural) and the correct decision. If one argues that it's less likely the child might get HIV or other diseases, well that argument may stand up if your child is born in sub Saharan Africa but not in the UK. That's what condoms are for!
Again, you could be here all day with this subject, that's just my input as a Man
