BabyandBump - Pregnancy, Trying to conceive, Baby & Parenting Forum

Go Back   BabyandBump > Pregnancy Forums > Pregnancy - First Trimester
  

Welcome to BabyandBump's

Pregnancy - First Trimester

 Forum - Conception > 13 weeks - Congratulations your expecting. Rest your feet & start sharing your wonderful journey with others. This thread is called '

Interpreting ultrasound notes...

' and is in our

Pregnancy Forums

 section.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Feb 17th, 2008, 10:12 AM   #11
Chat Happy BnB Member
 
RachieH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paderborn, Germany
Posts: 1,255

Thanked others: 51
Thanked 184 times in 182 posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mervs Mum View Post

On the scan notes it starts :

'Enlarged Uterus. A 0.5cm diameter intrauterine cycstic area is noted ? containing a tiny yolk sac, too early to see FH or fetal pole.'
Can anyone shed any light on why they would put a '?' and is the 'intrauterine cycstic area' the gestational sac??
At your gestation, the only thing to be seen is a tiny gestational sac, you WOULD NOT yet be able to see a baby or fetal pole or fetal heartbeat. I had a scan just over 5 weeks and only the tiniest of gestational sacs could be seen. I assume the question mark by "'intrauterine cycstic area" is basically saying they presume a gestational sac but won't confirm it at this point as the fetal pole has not yet been observed, so at present its a questionable Cystic area. Presumably this is just the Sonographer being non commital - I wouldn't worry about it.

This is a scan at 5.5 weeks, where no fetal pole was seen:
http://www.ob-ultrasound.net/images/5-5weeks.jpg

So far everything is normal for your gestation, so try not to worry too much!

-At your next scan you will find that once the fetal pole or HB has been observed, there will be no question marks, just a confimed pregnancy!
__________________
Status: Offline
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFacebook this post!
The following user says 'Thanks' to RachieH for this post:
Mervs Mum (Feb 17th, 2008)
Old Feb 17th, 2008, 10:19 AM   #12
Full Term & Ready 2 Rock!
BnB Addict
 
Mervs Mum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 7,104

Thanked others: 1,749
Thanked 2,658 times in 2,266 posts

I'm Currently Feeling: 


Thanks sooo much Rach! The scan showed a 'black hole' and she pointed out a small bump sort of attached to it and said that was the yolk sac - very similar to the pic in the link.
__________________
Status: Online
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFacebook this post!
Old Feb 17th, 2008, 10:29 AM   #13
Chat Happy BnB Member
 
RachieH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paderborn, Germany
Posts: 1,255

Thanked others: 51
Thanked 184 times in 182 posts


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mervs Mum View Post
Thanks sooo much Rach! The scan showed a 'black hole' and she pointed out a small bump sort of attached to it and said that was the yolk sac - very similar to the pic in the link.
Yes, the yolk sac is whats attached to the baby nourishing it - so hopefully by the next scan you will see the tiny baby with the yolk sac attached, the sac usually looks like a little halo attached to baby.
It all sounds normal for your stage.
__________________
Status: Offline
 
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFacebook this post!
The following user says 'Thanks' to RachieH for this post:
Mervs Mum (Feb 17th, 2008)
Reply

  BabyandBump > Pregnancy Forums > Pregnancy - First Trimester


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fertomid (Notes for me - Sorry) Wobbles Long Term TTC & Assisted Conception 14 May 19th, 2008 09:11 AM
Getting Married - Change My Name on My Notes ?? Louisa K Pregnancy - Second Trimester 6 Dec 7th, 2007 22:41 PM
had my ultrasound and.... vejables Pregnancy - Second Trimester 18 Nov 14th, 2007 00:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® ©2008 Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd