I couldn't see a thread about this so wondered what you all thought. Since the Stephen Gately article controversy, Jan Moir and her DM filth makes my skin crawl. What that paper gets away with (not unaided by the fact that their editor is on the board at the press complaints commision) is abborant.
But anyway, what do you think?
Quote:
I'm afraid too many mums are self-righteous
By Jan Moir
Come on, mums! Left, right, left, right, shoulders back, chest out, nipple in: go, go, go!
After a nursing mother was thrown out of a South-East London charity shop this week, angry mums are mobilising to launch a mass breast-feed-in on the premises. Hungry or not, mewling tots must be prepared to shut up and glug back in the name of lactating-mum liberty and breast-is-best propagandists.
For the mothers are appalled by the behaviour of Steve Symonds, the manager of the East Dulwich branch of the charity shop Mind in South-East London. After finding Anisa Baker in a compromising position with ten-month-old Elsie in the changing room, Mr Symonds sprayed air freshener around and chastised her for feeding her baby in his shop. 'Changing rooms aren't for breast-feeding,' he said, before telling her that her 'breast milk stinks'.
Isn't diplomacy a beautiful thing? Yet this small incident has been the starting gun for a blast of instant maternal affront and Curse Of The Mummy-style fury. Emphasising once more that it takes a brave man - or woman - to get between the modern young mother and her perceived statutory rights.
These include, as if we all didn't know, the right to mow you down with a buggy if you don't get out of the way quickly enough; the right to behave as if they have just given birth to the second coming of Christ instead of a farty little squirt called Sam; the right to congregate en masse all day in the best coffee shop seats, sharing a single latte and a blueberry muffin between six; the right to sigh like a tornado when their Hummer-sized pram cuts your heel to the bone; and the general and overreaching right to behave as if the normal rules of polite society do not apply to them.
For her part, Mrs Baker - true to breast-feeding mummy form - was 'amazingly insulted' to be told that her milk was odiferous and challenged the manager for looking into the cubicle in the first place. Now, she wants Mind to announce a clear policy allowing breast-feeding and guaranteeing privacy behind curtains.
Really. What self-righteous humbug. Why should Mind do anything of the sort?
Agreed, perhaps the shop manager did not behave with the utmost tact and charm. Even in a charity shop, refolding the jumpers and cataloguing Alan Titchmarsh novels is not enough effort in the customer relations department.
His managerial skills definitely need refreshing, not to mention his childcare skills; spraying an aerosol near a baby is never advisable, even if it is making a lot of noise.
However, let us be fair. Isn't it also rather shabby of Mrs Baker to hint to newspapers that the manager might be some kind of peeping tom? Especially as it seems possible that she snuck into Mind with the express intention of feeding her baby there.
All this is another skirmish in the ongoing milk wars. Yet for many, the argument that women should be allowed to breast-feed wherever they like has gone too far.
The application of decency and consideration for the feelings of others is, after all, a two-way street.
Whatever happened to make mums so angry all the time? Previous generations managed perfectly well without the need to breast-feed in public. Yet the National Childbirth Trust is waging a campaign to make it illegal to stop women from breast-feeding in shops and restaurants in the UK.
Well, I do hope it fails. Yes, most of us want to be kind to starving infants, if not their bolshie mums. But surely it should be up to individual owners to decide what does and does not happen on their premises?
Campaigners and mothers always like to occupy the moral high ground by insisting that those who object are curmudgeons. Why, breast-feeding is the most natural and beautiful thing in the world, they cry. Well, so is urinating, but no one insists on doing that wherever and whenever the need takes their fancy. Not outside France, at any rate.
Personally, I don't mind breast-feeding, but I mind that others do. And I mind that their objections are increasingly steamrollered by the righteous motherhood. Why should society, bus passengers and charity shop managers be terrorised by militant mothers determined to give junior his num-nums whatever the circumstances?
Perhaps a little decorum and understanding from all sides wouldn't go amiss? Otherwise it will be more tears before bedtime.
|
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/ar...righteous.html